beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 72,339,024 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 35,569,515 to Plaintiff B; and (c) from November 24, 2016 to each of them.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendant removed the C market located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and newly built and sold the main complex building (E; hereinafter “instant building”) of the fourth and tenth floor above the ground as shown in the attached Table on the ground, is a reconstruction maintenance project partnership established on April 21, 2004. The F was a person who was in office as the head of the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Cooperative”) from September 201 to December 24, 2014, and the Plaintiffs are the Defendant’s members.
B. On July 23, 2010, the Defendant entered into a contract for construction works with G Co., Ltd. and completed almost the instant building on May 2013, and obtained approval for use on September 6, 2013.
The registration of initial ownership of the instant building was made on January 15, 2014, and the Plaintiff A completed each registration of initial ownership on H and I (each of the sections listed in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the attached Table) among the second floor of the instant building, and Plaintiff B completed each registration of initial ownership on J (section 1 of the attached Table) among the second floor of the instant building.
(F) The second floor of the instant building is a partitioned building owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “the Plaintiff’s respective sections”) and the second floor of the instant building is a building of between K and L, and M, H, and H have completed the registration of initial ownership on January 15, 2014 by the Defendant Cooperatives, the AAA High School No. 14, the AB, and the AB. The H, H, and I completed the registration of initial ownership of the Plaintiff’s respective sections of the building of this case.
C. After that, on March 11, 2014 with respect to the instant building, the approval for the change of use was completed on or before May 16, 2014.
On January 30, 2013, F, the president of the Defendant Union, proposed a plan to lease all the two floors to the members of the Defendant Union without installing partitions on the second floor of the instant building for the revitalization of commercial buildings, including the Plaintiffs.