The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (1) where the Defendant invested approximately KRW 170 million from around 2003 to around 2005, but failed to recover it, the Defendant again invested KRW 600 million from around September 2008, and where it is not recovered from the victim’s interest or profit prior to making an additional investment from the money, it seems that the Defendant received a little amount of interest or profit from the investment since around May 201, and it was well known that it is difficult to recover the investment from F due to the Defendant’s failure to receive it from the victim’s money, and that it was difficult to recognize that the Defendant was unaware of the Defendant’s ability to recover the amount of investment from the Defendant’s money because it was difficult to recognize that the Defendant was unaware of the amount of investment from the victim’s money to the end of September 2011, and that it was difficult to find the Defendant not guilty of the amount of investment from the Defendant’s money borrowed from the Defendant’s money to the end of September 2011.

2. Examining the evidence of this case closely in light of the record, the lower court, based on the reasons stated in its reasoning, determined as follows: (a) the Defendant had a claim for the refund of investment deposit equivalent to KRW 600 million against F; and (b) from F, on January 201.