A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing business operations at the Daejeon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 22, 2017.

The Defendant, from around 12:00 on September 8, 2017 to 13:05 on the same day, at the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D, located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, on the ground that customers seat beside the Defendant were the Defendant, and on the ground that they were the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) why they were “hing, chewing, hing, hinging, hinginging, and singing.”

“The victim reported to the police” on the ground that the victim reported to the police. “The victim reported to the police”

In this year, this h, N. D.’s h.h., h., and h.h.’s h.a.h., and h.h., h. to prevent customers from entering the restaurant by avoiding disturbance, such as gathering the h.e., the h., the l.b. h., the l.s. at the l.m., the l

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiries about criminal history and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on criminal investigation reports (an investigation into the admission of a suspect in prison and the confirmation of the date of release);

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [the scope of recommendations] interference with the duties of Article 35 of the Criminal Act [the grounds for sentencing of category 1 (Interference with Business) (one year to three years) [the person subject to special aggravation]] the same repeated crime [the defendant's decision] is against the defendant's wrongness while leading to the crime. However, the degree of interference with business is not easy and the measures for recovery from damage are not taken. The defendant has already been punished for the crime of violence or interference with business not less than 30 times and has already been punished for the same crime, and immediately after the release of the defendant, the punishment is imposed as ordered.