1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall consist of a principal lawsuit and a counterclaim.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil

(A) The first instance court’s findings and determination are deemed to be reasonable even if the Plaintiff submitted evidence No. 7 to this court duly adopted and investigated by the court of first instance. 2. 2. The second instance court’s “land prior to the instant subdivision 226-1” in the second instance part 17, and 18 of the body of evidence No. 226-1 is the land prior to the instant subdivision 226-2 and 710 square meters (hereinafter “the land prior to the instant subdivision 226-2”; from the 226-1 land prior to the instant subdivision to October 29, 1964 to the 20th instance court’s “(the land prior to the instant subdivision 226-1 was divided from the 226-2 land to the 36th instance court’s land prior to the instant subdivision 36-1, each of the 36th instance court’s land divided from the 266th instance city planning to the 36-197th square meters of the instant land.”

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's main claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's counterclaim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.