Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants conspired to steal precious metals, etc. by intrusion into the “E” bank operated by the victim D in Daegu Northern-gu C, Ma-ro.

At around 01:00 on September 29, 2018, the Defendants confirmed the following: (a) on the restaurant located in F of the same Gu where Defendant B works as an employee, the Defendants: (b) on board the said restaurant with drber and pentator; and (c) on the part of Defendant A’s Gpoter, the Defendants moved the said “E” vehicle to a droid; and (d) whether the surrounding commercial buildings are in operation; (b) whether the entrance was corrected after the discharge.

The Defendants continued to wait around the bank until all of the above commercial buildings around the bank complete the business. At around 03:50 on the same day, Defendant B waiting at the above stetete vehicle, and Defendant A fleded with the warning device at the rate of 10% of the entrance door back to the front door of the above steteel, and Defendant A escaped.

As a result, the Defendants, together, tried to steals property by destroying another person's structure at night, but attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (CCTV investigation), a criminal investigation report (Attachment to clothes, etc. worn by a suspect A), and a criminal investigation report (Attachment to photographs, such as hat worn by a suspect at the time of the criminal investigation

1. Articles 342 and 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 25 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for attempted mitigation;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the defendant reflects his mistake, the defendant A has no history of criminal punishment, the defendant B is a primary offender, and the crime of this case is committed in relation to an attempted crime) or more of the Criminal Code (the crime of this case is committed) of the suspended execution (the defendant is against his mistake).