logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2020.05.12 2020고단123
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 2003, the Defendant was married with C, the mother of the victim B, and was divorced on November 21, 2019.

At around 03:00 on March 17, 2020, the Defendant: (a) entered the Dogra Dog-dong Building, which was a victim’s residence, through public stairs, carried the front corridor of the Fhobu Dog-gu, which is a victim’s residence; and (b) arbitrarily divided the front door into the corrective device, and attempted to open the front door, thereby infringing on the victim’s residence; (c) from that point of time, the Defendant intruded the victim’s residence more than five times in total, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 13:00 on the same day; and (d) destroyed the above corrective device by having the non-person under whose name the key to the victim’s name was removed without the victim’s permission, as shown in attached Form 2 No. 2 of the list of crimes.

2. On March 17, 2020, the Defendant was arrested of the police officers belonging to the G District as a flagrant offender in the crime of intrusion upon their residence, who was called out after receiving a report of 112 at the said place. On the back of the patrol vehicle, the Defendant was arrested of the police officers belonging to the G District as a flagrant offender in the crime of intrusion upon residence. On the back of the patrol vehicle and moved to the G District, the Defendant was able to avoid tobacco in advance, and the victim’s face was removed from the situation of the victim’s H., one time due to the head, and the victim’s face was put up at one time due to his head, and the victim’s desire was made up at one time due to his head.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the handling of 112 Reports, and at the same time, the Defendant saw the victim as being in the vicinity of the snow in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to B and H;

1. 112. List of reported cases;

1. A certified copy of register;

1. Blue boxes and video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act (including the occupation of residence, including the occupation of residence), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of destruction and damage of property), Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime.

arrow