Defendant

A and E Imprisonment for one year and six months, and Defendant B for two years and two months, and Defendant C, D, and G for two years and six months, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】

1. On March 9, 2012, Defendant B was sentenced to 8 months imprisonment on April 13, 2012, on the part of the Gwangju District Court’s Net Branch, to a fraud under the Act on the Acceptance of “Sishing,” in which the money in the name of a loan commission through text messages, which is the same as the method of the instant crime, was stolen, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 17, 2012. On April 4, 2012, the Gwangju District Court sentenced to 20 years of suspension of execution to 6 months of imprisonment, and acquired the nominal money in the guarantee insurance premium through a false loan advertisement similar to the method of the instant crime, and became final and conclusive on April 13, 2012.

2. On November 24, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to three years and six years of suspension of execution on December 2, 2011, to the crime of fraud under the "Sscaming," by deceiving the money in the name of commission through false loan advertisement similar to the method of the instant crime in the Seocheon Branch of the Daejeon District Court on November 24, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 2, 201. On March 9, 2012, the Gwangju District Court was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on March 17, 2012 under the "Scaming," which acquired the money in the name of the loan commission through the same method of the instant crime in the "Scaming," by means of fraud under the "Scaming," which was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for April, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant B, at around 2010, listen to the phrase, Defendant B, “A may pay money by receiving money in the name of the loan fee, by raising a loan advertisement on a living information page, etc., and by deceiving the person who has already committed an act of “singing” under the same method,” and Defendant A, along with Defendant A, committed an act of “singing” under the above method, during the course of committing the crime of “singing” under the name of the loan fee. The number of victims who had already been contacted is not a large number of victims, and using the “DB” through the “DB business operator.”