(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.30 2016나33119

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.30 2016나33119

채무부존재확인

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

(b) shall be deemed to have consented if the designer fails to express his/her non-exclusive consent within one month from the date of the notification;

(5) Where the standards for payment of fees are changed, a company shall, without delay, notify such change by posting it at the City/Do computer network or store, and make it available for a designer to peruse at all times

Article 7 (Refund, etc. of Fees) (1) Where an insurance contract solicited by a designer is terminated due to the cancellation of an application, or the validity of the insurance contract is terminated due to invalidation, invalidation, cancellation (including a violation of a standardized contract and obligation to deliver a duplicate of an application, a violation of a duty to explain the terms and conditions, a violation of a contractor's duty to write-off, omission in signature or seal, etc.) or cancellation, etc., the company shall not pay fees

(2) Matters concerning the refund of other fees shall be governed by the standards for the payment of fees.

** Fees payment criteria

8. The redemption of the FP commission shall be invalidated, void, responsible compensation, and the full amount of new contracts (including new contracts of April 2008), maintenance service fees, FP-CB performance fees, and long-term settlement support fees (including the existing ones) already paid after April 2008 (including new contracts of April 2008) shall be recovered as follows: (a) Long-term settlement support fees shall be recovered from the commission FP on April 2012 to the FP on March 2008 (including the contract of March 2008) before the contract of March 2008 (including the contract of March 2008) shall be recovered in full (including the previous payments of January 3, 2008), and if the FP under the commission of August 3, 2003, at the request of the relevant branch office of the FPF in return of the total amount of the existing amount, the amount shall be recovered from the FPP fee to the claim restitution fee and the amount in question shall be recovered from the following reasons:

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원고양지원 2016.05.19 2015가단28237

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.12.31 2012가단329545

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.25 2014나9969

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.23 2016가단5052978

-서울동부지방법원 2016.09.09 2016나2293