1. On July 12, 2013, the Defendant’s disposition of allocating the proceeds of public sale (excluding the distribution) against the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 27, 2013, the Defendant issued a public auction notification as to the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table owned by the Dong in attached Form No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

The amount of claims on the refund of deposit 15,00,000,000 14,000,000,000 2D 2D 14,000,000,000 3 E E 3 E 10,000,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,50,000 local taxes on the refund of deposit 2,50,06,2101,271,3206, 3206 G 67, 3206, 30,006, 30,006, 10,000 30,000, 30,000, 300,306,506, 406,005,06,

B. On May 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) sold the instant real estate at KRW 175,870,00,00; and (b) prepared the first distribution statement of the amount to be distributed on June 28, 2013: (a) KRW 170,196,130 [the amount to be distributed on June 28, 2013 [the sales price of KRW 175,870,00 and KRW 126,790] - KRW 5,80,660 for disposition on default, as follows:

C. On July 1, 2013, the Defendant discovered that the pertinent tax had been filed double claims among the amount claimed by the head of Sungsung head of the Gu, and prepared the second distribution statement by changing the Plaintiff’s distributed amount to KRW 765,540, and KRW 47,430,590, respectively, among the first distribution statement of the first distribution statement.

The distribution amount of the second distribution statement(cost) of the 3rd distribution statement(the 14,000,000,000 15,000,000,000,000,000 won for the 14,000,000 won for the 14,000,000 for the 15,430,590,000 for the 14,000 for the 3D lease deposit refund claim(s) for the 14,000,000 for the 15,430,590,000 for the 4 E E-Lease lease deposit refund claim(s) for the 14.00,000,000,000,000 for the increased 5,000,007,007,000 for the 12,003.