logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.08.10 2018고단240
명예훼손등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, defamation around September 2017 and around October 5, 2017.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 22, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in October, 10, due to interference with the execution of official duties, etc. in the extension support of the District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 11, 2018.

The Defendant, “2018 Highest 240, 2018, the Defendant, knowing that the said victim was remarriedd by adjoining neighbors residing in the victim B’s side house, thought that the victim had a false answer to the victim, by spreading a false question.

1. In December 2016, 2016, the Defendant’s defamation of Habman was made on the roads near the Defendant’s house located in Pakistan on December 2016, 2016, and even if the victim was not overlapped, the Defendant’s “B” is in the presence of the female president D and female members.

Many years are overlapping.

The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “h.” was also known to son.

2. On March 30, 2017, the Defendant of defamation: (a) around March 30, 2017, the neighboring Party F’s house located in E at around 14:00 on March 30, 2017, despite the fact that the victim does not overlap, the Defendant “B overlaps with the front house.”

The year is the third year.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

Around January 8, 2010, the Defendant filed a civil suit against an insurance company regarding a traffic accident (a disposition that does not have the authority to institute a public prosecution on February 9, 2010) due to the unification of Dobong Island at the time of Pakistan, and was unable to receive adequate compensation due to the number of injury inflicted on the Defendant’s statement and diagnosis during the police investigation process of the traffic accident, and accordingly, filed a complaint against the police officer in charge of the traffic accident on several occasions from around 2011, and filed a civil petition, such as finding the police officer in charge of the traffic accident and taking a bath about the police officer and taking part in the corridor.

1. On May 8, 2013, the Defendant committed a crime on around May 8, 2013.

arrow