The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the necessity of relief measures in the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., an escapeing vehicle) and the existence of awareness as to the existence of the necessity of and injury to such measures, and the necessity of measures for the prevention of traffic hazards and obstacles

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.