A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Daegu District Court for the crime of interference with business, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 16th of

Criminal facts

On February 10, 2014, the Defendant submitted a written complaint stating false facts about E, F, G, and H, a police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report 112 at the time, at a permanent police station located in Sung-dong 13-2, a place where the Defendant had interfered with his/her business, to the resident police station located in Sung-dong 13-2. On February 26, 2014, the Defendant made a statement to the assistant assistant of the above police station in charge of the above case on February 26, 2014.

In full view of the contents of the written complaint and the Defendant’s additional statement, the purport of the complaint was that “D assaulted several times on February 3, 2014 on the part of the Defendant’s bridge, and E, F, G, and H committed an assault against the Defendant in the course of arrest.” However, on February 3, 2014, the Defendant did not have been subject to the crime of interference with business in the above E, F, G, and H in the process of arresting the Defendant. However, at around 11:00, around February 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) “W was dead; (b) was dead; (c) was dead; (d) was dead; (d) was dead; (d) was f, G, and H; (d) the Defendant was f, and was arrested as a flagrant offender during the course of the crime of interference with business, and did not have been subject to the crime of interference with business.

In this respect, the defendant had the above D, E, F, G, and H with the aim of having the above D, E, F, G, and H punished punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E, F, G and H;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 157, 153 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of confessions;

1. The assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under the latter part of Article 37 and Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes.