logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.09.23 2016나11033
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of the instant case is as follows, and the reasoning for the instant judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the portions to be determined additionally in the following sub-paragraph (2). As such, this is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the medical records of the first instance court, the term “this Court” was two different types of “the first instance court.” The 5th sentence “2010.” to “the 7th sentence and the 5th sentence of the first instance court.” The following was added to “the 7th sentence and the 4th sentence of the first instance court.” The medical dispute mediation and mediation commission of the first instance court did not provide any evidence that the medical record appraisal commission of the first instance court “the 6th sentence of the first instance court was caused by the weakening’s disease, the pathic disease, and the spread of infection.” Rather, in the medical records of the 1,000th National Hospital Hospital, the medical dispute mediation and mediation agency suggested that “the 14th sentence “the 2010th sentence” of the first instance court judgment did not provide any “the 3th sentence of the first instance court judgment,” or that the 1st sentence of the first instance court judgment did not provide any explanation to the Plaintiff at the time of the surgery, thereby failing to give sufficient explanation to the Plaintiff at the time of the surgery.

In addition to the statement of evidence No. 1, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital, at the time of the first operation, explain the contents of the first operation to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's guardian about the risks, side effects, etc. of the operation, including infection caused by urology, and then recognize the fact that he/she received written consent.

arrow