1. Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. based on a contract between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant for the payment guarantee of import transaction price as of January 2, 2012.

1. Basic facts

가. 원고 주식회사 A(이하 ‘원고 회사’라고만 한다)은 2011. 12. 28. 파키스탄 소재 넵튠 트레이딩 콘선(NEPTUNE TRADING CONCERN, 이하 ‘넵튠’이라 한다)과 설탕 100MT을 미화 50,000달러에 구매하기로 하는 수입거래계약을 체결하였다.

나. 원고 회사는 넵튠에 대한 위 수입거래대금채무의 지급보증을 위하여 대표자인 사내이사 원고 B이 연대보증을 하여 피고 은행과 2012. 1. 2. 미화 50,000달러에 대한 지급보증(이하 ‘이 사건 지급보증’이라 한다)계약을 맺었고, 피고 은행은 같은 날 넵튠의 무역대금 결제은행인 파키스탄 방글라데시 소재 프라임 뱅크(PRIME BANK 이하 ‘프라임은행’이라 한다)에게 위 지급보증을 내용으로 하는 전신문을 발송하였다.

C. On January 31, 2012, the Defendant bank received the full text of the claim for the payment of USD 50,000 from the Franchi Bank, and on the following day.

2. 1. 넵뷴의 이행청구 전문을 수신하였다. 라.

Plaintiff

The company and the plaintiff B demanded the defendant bank to pay the above US$ 50,000, but the defendant bank paid US$ 50,000 to the Franchi Bank through the well-known High Bank on February 9, 2012.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 3 through 8 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The legal principle is independent of the cause relationship between the principal debtor and the creditor, and only if there is a beneficiary's request without defense against the beneficiary due to the cause relationship, it shall be called the so-called independent bank guarantee which causes the guarantor's unconditional payment obligation. Accordingly, the guarantor of such bank guarantee shall be the guarantor's relationship with the beneficiary only when the beneficiary makes a request.