Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the chief executive officer of the tax accounting corporation's "B" and the victim C (n, 21 years old) is an employee of the same corporation.

The defendant, as a workplace master of the victim, had been able to commit an indecent act against the victim in an opportunity to drink with the victim.

On October 28, 2015, at around 19:00, the Defendant saw to drink with the victim at the cross-fluoral beer house located in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

In spite of the victim's refusal to take the victim's hand, the defendant took advantage of the circumstances that the victim could not forcibly refuse the above behavior of the defendant on the ground that he was a workplace company, and took advantage of the above circumstances, the victim's face was limited to about five times per hour and about 30 minutes per hour for drinking alcohol, and the victim's hand booms with the victim and knicked or knicked by hand.

At around 21:00 on the same day, the Defendant got from the beer house and walked along with the victim, and the Defendant was not able to reduce the part of the victim by selling.

After the night, the injured person is expected to go at the night.

However, the taxi was moved to the upper knife-dong while "I ambling with the knife-dong," and "I ambling with the taxi."

The defendant put a mark on the entry of the victim at the entrance of the trade name inbucheon-dong, but he is willing to leave the victim as the victim refuses to do so.

At the same time, the taxi was moved to the vicinity of the victim's residence on board with the victim.

At around 22:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) called “the victim who gets off from the taxi to house” from the alleyway near the residence of the victim of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D; (b) however, even though the victim refused to do so, the victim was trying to house despite his refusal, and (c) the victim was able to walk along with the victim, and was able to have the sloping part of the victim’s humf.

Accordingly, the defendant is under the supervision of the defendant due to the work as a workplace trading company.