1. The defendant among the distribution schedule prepared by the said court on October 31, 2013 with respect to the distribution procedure case of Daejeon District Court C.

1. Basic facts

A. G Co., Ltd. (the trade name of H Co., Ltd. was changed to G on June 8, 2013, and changed to the corporate register on June 10, 2013; hereinafter “G”) issued and delivered the instant promissory note to the Defendant on November 2, 2012, at the face value of KRW 1.5 billion and below one promissory note entered in the payment at the sight of the due date, and on the same day, at the time of delay in the payment of the said note, the said promissory note was issued and delivered to the Defendant. If the payment of the said note is delayed on the same day, a notary public belonging to the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor’s Office to the effect that there is no objection even if he/she is subject to compulsory execution, the said deed (hereinafter “the instant notarial deed”).

was drawn up.

B. On December 31, 2012, the Defendant filed an application for the attachment and assignment order with the Daejeon District Court 2012TTT 17862 on the basis of the instant notarial deed with the Daejeon District Court on January 3, 2013, for the attachment and assignment order, and on January 3, 2013, G’s claim for construction price due to the construction work of the Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon District Court’s Daejeon District Court’s construction work of the Daejeon District Senior Complex and “L below the social welfare foundation.”

In relation to the claim for construction cost of KRW 600,00,000 due to the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and N-ground N-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O'

On January 7, 2013, the above order was served on the Estune and L and became final and conclusive on January 22, 2013.

C. The Plaintiff’s designated party, hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”).

'A' and 'the 'the 'Plaintiff'.

) D, E, and F filed an application for provisional attachment with the Daejeon District Court 2013Kadan3606 for provisional attachment against the amount of KRW 16,20,00 (Plaintiff A3,450,000, Plaintiff D4,500,000, Plaintiff E3,750,000, Plaintiff F4,500,000, and up to the amount of KRW 4,500,00, among the claim for the said O-built construction cost for L by Daejeon District Court 2013Kadan3606, May 21, 2013.

L is served on July 5, 2013 on the grounds that L was served on several claims for the construction cost due to the above new construction works held by G with respect to L.