1. The disposition that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on September 24, 2013 as bereaved family benefits and funeral site pay shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. B (hereinafter “the father”) who is the father of the Plaintiff was employed by the Plaintiff Company and the Access Management System. From March 1, 2011, the Plaintiff served as security guards in the Handong-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si as security guards.

On January 3, 2013, the Deceased was used in the apartment patrol around 04:30, and sent back to the Slick University Slick Hospital.

After that, on January 4, 2013, the Deceased died from cerebral cerebral dysty on 09:37.

B. On September 24, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses, but on the grounds that “it is difficult to see that there was overwork or stress to the extent that there was an obvious influence on the outbreak in light of work hours, work volume, robbery, etc., and that there was a death of an existing disease, such as high blood pressure, due to the natural transitional aggravation of such an existing disease, etc.” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed a request for reexamination. On December 6, 2013, the Plaintiff was dismissed by the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, each entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including provisional number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. In light of the fact that the Plaintiff’s assertion deceased was in the cumulative state of occupational work and stress, and that the work volume was increased due to continuous snow removal work, that was exposed to the weather weather that started 10 days prior to the death, that was unable to properly rest during the recess hours, that was 16 degrees prior to the death, that was 16 degrees subsequent to the death of the deceased, and that cerebrovascular occurred during the course of performing the new wall patrol work, there was a proximate causal relationship between the deceased’s death and the work, and thus, the instant disposition is unlawful.

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant statutes;

C. (1) In fact, the Deceased’s work form and strength (A) is serving as one-time apartment security guards from March 1, 2011 to January 3, 2013.