beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On May 15, 2008, the Defendant approved on May 15, 2008, the establishment of a new factory D and E on the ground of Kimpo-si D and E.
B. On November 27, 2008, the representative F of B filed an application for approval of the change of factory establishment with the purport that the representative of the enterprise would change F to F, and the factory site would be changed to D, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si (hereinafter “instant land 1”) and G forest (hereinafter “instant land 2”), and obtained approval from the Defendant.
C. On June 22, 2011, the Plaintiff acquired the status related to the permission to build a new factory on the instant land Nos. 1 and 2 from F, and filed an application with the Defendant for approval of change of a new factory with the purport of changing the name of the company and its representative to H and the Plaintiff on July 21, 2011, and obtained approval from the Defendant.
The Plaintiff purchased the instant land No. 1 from I on February 21, 2012, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in its name after purchasing each of the instant land No. 2 from F.
E. On August 23, 2013, the Plaintiff completed registration of preservation of ownership of a factory building newly built on each of the instant lands under its name. The instant land was combined with the instant land No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”) on October 25, 2013, and on the same day, the instant land was changed from forest land to land for factory.
F. On July 7, 2014, the Defendant determined and imposed development charges of KRW 102,556,920 on the Plaintiff in accordance with the Restitution of Development Gains Act (hereinafter “instant disposition”), and on September 15, 2014, the Defendant reduced the said development charges of KRW 95,137,760 by taking account of the details of payment of capital gains tax on September 15, 2014.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 8 through 11 (including those with serial numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 22 (including those with serial numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff's assertion 1.