The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of operating a new franchise bus owned by the influoral tourism-holding company.

At around 20:10 on April 16, 2014, the Defendant made the left turn to the left at the right speed in the direction of the rear door at the front of the vehicle’s waiting place.

At night, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving duty of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure the safety of career and prevent accidents by keeping the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop on the front side and the left side side of the vehicle, and led the victim C (the 36-year old) who was crossinged in the direction of the waiting place of the vehicle in the lst place of the vehicle in the front side of the vehicle of the Defendant, and led the victim's left side buckbucks to the back side of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered a serious injury to a permanent pedestrian disability due to the victim’s occupational negligence, such as a sloping-gu of both sides, the left-hand fluor, the damage caused by the pressure failure on the part of the lower-class, the lower-class, the lower-class, and the loss of the body surface by a 30% fluence.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to a written agreement bound in the trial records, C may recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wishing to punish the Defendant on January 15, 2015, which is after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag.