The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual errors and misapprehension of legal principles), although the Defendant’s speech and behavior constituted a notice of harm and injury with the intention of harm, the court below acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged in this case, there is an error of law by mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

2. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) around 18:30 on November 18, 2018, 2018, he was boarding a taxi operated by the victim E (Nam, 52 years of age) as a guest in the front bus stop located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju-gu, and, (b) “I may promptly see the Defendant as the latter part of Gwangju-gu, and immediately 12 minutes of the time; (c) the victim may move the Defendant into the latter part of Gwangju-gu, and immediately break the vehicle at the low time; and (d) the Defendant, in his ownization, i.e., “I am off the taxi dog so that I want to boost, I am off the taxi,” and (d) the victim took the taxi back to Gwangju-gu, and “I am am son, I am am son,” and “I am am son, I am am son and am son,” and “I am am am son,”.

3. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated, the lower court recognized that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone intended to inflict a bodily injury on the Defendant’s speech and behavior as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.