logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.01 2017노434
폭행등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles) found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged based on the victim’s unilateral statement, although the Defendant did not assault the victim or threatened the victim with the same content as the entries in the facts charged, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine and misapprehending the legal doctrine

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below [the witness F, I’s each legal statement, internal investigation report (related to the confirmation of CCTV video data in front of the rehabilitation course), investigation report (in front of the rehabilitation course), photographs, etc.], since the victim F, witness I’s statement corresponding to the facts charged are reliable, the facts charged in this case can be found guilty, and the defendant’s assertion of misunderstanding of the facts and misapprehension of the legal principles is without merit.

The victim has made a specific and consistent statement in the investigative agency and the court of the court below regarding the contents of the damage, such as the facts charged, and the victim's statement conforms to objective data, such as CCTV and photograph.

With the exception of the part that the defendant has assaulted or threatened a victim, the victim's statement and the statement of the defendant are generally consistent with the victim's statement with regard to the developments leading up to the victim and the defendant's interview, the contents of conversation, and the fact that there was a vaga

The victim knew that the defendant has a complaint against the refusal of the payment of insurance money, and then recorded the defendant at the time of the delivery of the defendant, and there is no other circumstance that the victim could find out.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is not reasonable.

arrow