1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1.The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 7:

The Plaintiff entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with B with respect to Crocketing automobiles (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). The instant insurance contract includes a non-insurance special contract with the effect that the insured would compensate for any injury caused by an accident resulting from an non-insurance accident, and the child of the registered insured is included in the scope of the person entitled to claim compensation for the insurer if the insured suffers any injury caused by an non-insurance accident (Article 18 subparagraph 2 of the instant insurance contract).

D On February 23, 2015, at around 02:55, driving a two-wheeled vehicle owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant off-to-land”) and passing through the said intersection in violation of the signal at the intersection near the Suwon-si Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong, and caused the instant accident where a taxi operating the said Man-si Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-ro (hereinafter “instant accident”) caused the instant accident where the Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-do (hereinafter “the instant accident”). As a result, the instant accident caused approximately six (6) weeks of the Man-to-si Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-do Man-do.

C. As F is a child of B, who is the registered insured under the instant insurance contract, the Plaintiff paid F the insurance amount of KRW 15,181,610 in total (the treatment cost: 13,181,610, the consolation money: 2,000,000) by December 10, 2015, for medical expenses, etc. (the treatment cost: 13,181,610, the consolation money: 2,00,000).

Since then, the plaintiff is FA.