logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.06.04 2014나21746
소유권이전등기 말소등기절차이행등 청구
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "The part of the judgment of the court of first instance from 3th to 18th of 16th of 3th of 16 to 18 of 18 of 18 of 2nd of 3th of 3th of 3th of 100 is possessed, and there is a justifiable reason to believe that Defendant B had the authority to conclude the contract of this case on behalf of the plaintiff in lieu of the plaintiff in lieu of the plaintiff in this case, and therefore there is an express representation under Articles 125 and 126 of the Civil Act." The part of the judgment of the court of first instance from 4th of 4th of 4th of 4th, "it is difficult to view that the plaintiff had the basic power to represent the defendant B," or the part of the defendants' above assertion is without reason, and it is difficult to see that the plaintiff had the authority to represent the plaintiff in lieu of the plaintiff in accordance with Article 126 of the Civil Procedure Act."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow