The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case (excluding the part not guilty of the first instance court) on the grounds set forth in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “the purpose of slandering people” in the crime of defamation through information and communications networks, or by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.