logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.08.08 2018고정520
컴퓨터등사용사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Some of the facts charged were revised to the extent that it does not undermine the defendant's right of defense.

A. On May 28, 2017, the Defendant embezzled the property that was occupied by the Defendant, even after acquiring the credit card (credit card number C) from the blind distance in front of the Masung apartment apartment located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, but returned it to the lost person, etc., or embezzled the property that was possessed by himself/herself without submitting it to the police agency.

B. On May 28, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business: around 16:25:30, the Defendant was boarding in the subway station south of the 396 subway station in Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and around 16:36:45 on the same day, the Defendant paid KRW 1,250,00 to the credit card terminal of the opening house while getting off in the subway station in the subway station.

Accordingly, the Defendant used the lost credit card by the injured party.

Defendant stated “3129,913 won” in the indictment of KRW 2930,00 through 659 times from September 17, 2017, such as “crime inundation - Transportation Card Use Details” and “crime sight - Credit Card Use Details (excluding Transportation Card Use Details)” as “3129,913 won” in the indictment of KRW 63,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000 won. However, Defendant did not constitute an attempted act of illegal use of credit cards, as it did not constitute a violation of the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business.

The injured person settled the credit card and used the lost credit card.

(c)

The Defendant paid KRW 1,250,00 to the credit card device on which the victim lost at the date, time, and location of the aforementioned “B” but the credit card was brought to the credit card device on which the opening is marked.

Accordingly, the defendant obtained financial benefits equivalent to the same amount by inputting the credit card information without authority on the credit card terminal, which is the information processing unit.

arrow