logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.10.26 2018구단15680
난민불인정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. In the course of the disposition, the following facts: short-term sojourn status visit (C-3) on May 24, 2017, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the date of July 20, 2017, which was July 22, 2017, the date of application for refugee status recognition: The fact that there is no dispute over the determination of rejection of the decision of June 12, 2018 as of September 25, 2017, which was the date of application for objection, and that there is no ground for recognition of rejection of the decision of the decision of June 12, 2018, Gap’s evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, and

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a national of the Republic of Senegal (hereinafter “Senegal”).

The plaintiff is driving Oral Seaba in Senegal.

A traffic accident resulting in the death of a female child was sent to Korea.

Accordingly, the parents of women's children threatened with the death of the plaintiff.

Accordingly, the plaintiff has been in the Republic of Korea since he did not leave the Republic of Korea.

The plaintiff should be recognized as a refugee inasmuch as he/she is in danger of murdering from his/her parent, if he/she returns to Sejong.

B. Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected from the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, or who, due to such fear, does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea, or who is a state of nationality and who does not want to return.

He returned to the instant case, and received the Plaintiff

A threat asserting that it is or is likely to be a tort by a private person is merely a general illegal act by a private person, and does not fall under the grounds for recognition of refugee status stipulated in the Refugee Act, i.e., “g., race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.”

arrow