A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

A seized kacker (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Applicant for medical treatment and custody.

Criminal facts

The facts leading up to the medical treatment and custody and the facts leading up to the medical treatment and custody [criminal fact] Defendant and the requester for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) have weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental illness. On May 6, 2015, the victim C (24 years old) who was game in the above PC was in operation of the game on the ground that there was a cruel from his father on May 6, 2015, and the victim C (24 years old) was in operation of the game on the ground that the PC was in operation on the ground that the PC was in operation on the ground that the PC was in operation on the part of the victim’s left side (7.5cm in length on a day, 7.5cm in total length, 15cm in length). On one occasion, the victim continued to tear about 3 cm, and on the other, the victim’s snow left side and the luminous bones of the son’s body on the right side of the above left side of the k.

[Facts of Cause of Medical Treatment and Custody] The Defendant is a mentally handicapped person whose punishment is mitigated pursuant to Article 10(2) of the Criminal Act, and has committed a crime entailing imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment, and is in need of medical treatment and custody facilities and is in

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The following circumstances acknowledged by the need for treatment as indicated in the judgment, the risk of recidivism, and the notice of the result of a mental diagnosis of the defendant by the Medical Treatment and Custody Director, namely, the defendant, as a patient with serious behavioral disorder, such as expressing his sense of decentralization to the party who seems to have weak influence over himself/herself, without lack of judgment ability, appears to have committed the crime of this case as a patient with serious mental retardation (I Q 41). The defendant was judged as having been judged as having a disability 1st degree due to a pulmonary disorder, and was subject to hospital treatment and outpatient treatment several times from the past due to a mental disorder.