logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.06.26 2017가단22552
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From March 21, 2018, the above-mentioned A

subsection (b).

Reasons

1. According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 5 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on February 22, 2017, setting the lease deposit of KRW 20 million, KRW 1760,000 per month, KRW 1760,000 for rent (including additional tax, separate management expenses), and between February 26, 2017 and February 25, 2018, and delivered the instant real estate to the Defendant on February 26, 2017. The Defendant paid the first two-minutes and did not pay the rent to the present day after paying the first two-minutes, and on October 11, 2017, the Plaintiff’s notification that the lease was terminated as of October 20, 2017, and the Defendant was legally obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff on the ground that the lease was lawfully terminated.

Meanwhile, according to the evidence evidence Nos. 2 and 6, the Defendant’s total amount of KRW 10,208,00, and the late payment charge of unpaid rent amount of KRW 375,817 is the aggregate amount of KRW 880,000,000, and the amount of unjust enrichment corresponding to the rent accrued until March 20, 2018 after the termination of the lease is 8.8 million, and the management fee in arrears is 1.4 million, and the above aggregate amount of KRW 20,783,817 is deducted from the lease deposit amount of KRW 20,000,000,000, the lease deposit remains.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff money calculated by the ratio of KRW 17.60,00 per month from March 21, 2018 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow