The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) took two diskettes (hereinafter referred to as “respons”); (b) took one person’s photograph while making a single person’s demonstration; (c) took his photograph; and (d) took another person; and (c) thereafter, the victim F (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) took one’s spons and took another person’s spons; and (d) took another person’s spons to find the spons; and (c) took another person’s spons, following the victim’s spons, the victim kicked the spons used by the victim and knick the Defendant’s spons; and (d) did not inflict a bodily injury as described in the facts charged by destroying the victim’s body, following the victim’s body.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. On November 5, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 07:00 on November 5, 2012, the Defendant: (b) placed a ticket in D in Mad City C; (c) placed one person’s photograph while making a one person’s demonstration; and (d) placed a photo on a person who took a photograph.

The defendant saw the blicket that the victim gets off and gets away from the victim's body. The defendant blicked the victim's body and blicked the victim's body.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as knee knee knee knee, knee knee knee knee knee knee

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the basis of the witness F’s testimony and investigation report (No. 1st right 22 of the investigation record).

C. (1) The conviction in a criminal trial leads to a judge’s conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt.