Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant, around 19:00 on December 13, 201, at the house of the Defendant in Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, C 101, the victim D(44 years old), E and E are dangerous goods used at the kitchen while drinking alcohol, and the victim’s ship was knife knife in the kniff length of the knife, which is a dangerous object used at the kitchen, one time, and the victim was knife by a knife by a warden in need of approximately eight weeks of treatment.
On this issue, the defendant asserted that it was consistent from the time when the investigation agency was first examined to the time of this court, and that it was done with D and knife D with the wind that misleads the power control, and that it was not intentionally knife D with D with the intention to inflict injury on D, and that it was denied its criminal intent.
Therefore, the part that corresponds to the facts charged among the evidence of the defendant's criminal intent, the witness F's legal statement, and the police's statement on F's statement about the defendant's criminal intent corresponds to the facts charged, and the part that corresponds to D's statement about D' and E's statement about D's criminal intent is that the defendant who was in a dialogue between D's and E died, and that he reached D's line. This is a protocol that contains a full-time statement or a full-time statement about a person other than the defendant's criminal intent, and it does not constitute an exception to "where a person who made the original statement is unable to make a full-time statement" under Article 316 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act. Thus, this is inadmissible under Article 310-2 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Next, the statements in D's investigative agency and this court are consistent with the facts charged in that the defendant who was under way talks with himself and E reaches the knife in his own knife.
However, in the following respects, it is difficult to believe that the above D's statements are in trust.
D is prone to the defendant's knife with all knife with the defendant before knife.