logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.04.29 2013고단3524
공무집행방해등
Text

1. Defendant A

A. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

B. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 27, 2013, at around 02:24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported the occurrence of the assault on the roads located in Kimhae-si; (b) reported that F in the circumstance belonging to the E district, who was called out after receiving a report of the assault on the roads located in Kimhae-si, takes a chief door in order for the Defendant’s wife B to take aboard the Defendant’s wife B; (c) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of the reported case, and at the same time interfered with the police officer’s lawful performance of duties; and (d) damaged the repair cost of the vehicle used by the public offices, such as the postnice laps, to the extent of KRW 404,257.

2. Defendant B

A. On October 27, 2013, around 02:30 on October 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) took photographs of the damaged patrol vehicle H (24 years of age) before the E District Police Station E District of Kimhae Police Station located in G in Kimhae-si; (b) took photographs of the damaged patrol vehicle as referred to in the foregoing paragraph (1); (c) took the camera, took them away from the victim’s left side while obstructing the victim’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the case of damage to public goods; and (d) took the victim’s back to the left side, and at the same time interfered with the victim’s legitimate performance of duties on the handling of the case of damage to

B. The obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant: (a) around 04:30 on the same day, on the grounds that the loss, which was caused by the arrest of the victim in the act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act in the E district, was caught by the police officer I asked the victim Ha to take again any defect; (b) the victim Ha asked the victim Ha to ask the victim’s right-hand bucks, thereby obstructing the victim’s legitimate execution of duties; and (c) at the same time, the victim did not keep the right-hand side for two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to J, F, and H;

1. Investigation reports and internal investigation reports (to be accompanied by CCTV images for committing crimes B);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (Attachment of a written diagnosis of injury) and a written estimate for an investigation report;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Article 136 of the Criminal Act.

arrow