The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 30,000,000.

Defendant.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (two years of suspended sentence to eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment. The crime of this case is a false financial transaction data, etc. as if the defendant had the ability to bear self-charges, which was selected as a subsidy-support business operator based on this, and then received subsidies by submitting the relevant documents to avoid expenditure of a person who has been on the conditions of the subsidy continuously and received subsidies by submitting them to obtain them, while the crime of this case is a total of KRW 250,000,000,000 in the method of receiving a refund of the unrefilled amount, and the crime of defraudation of subsidies is not so poor that the crime of this case is very poor and the method of committing the crime is not much low, and even if such fraud of subsidies distor

Even if there is a concern for seriously damaging the purpose of the fiscal policy to be achieved through the disbursement of self-paid charges, and there is a reason for unfavorable sentencing, such as the Defendant’s leading the instant crime, but the Defendant withdraws his assertion of misunderstanding of legal principles in the course of the commission of the instant crime, and reflects the depth in the confession of the crime, there is no previous conviction, the full amount of the subsidies obtained by deceit was returned, and there is no use of the subsidies granted in excess according to the instant crime for personal interest regardless of the purpose of the business, and in the instant case, the Defendant has faithfully worked for about 20 years as Do professor. In the instant case, the Defendant has faithfully worked for about 20 years regardless of the purpose of the business, and the suspension of the execution thereof becomes final and conclusive, the Defendant’s wife will lose his teaching position; the Defendant’s wife, who is an accomplice, is subject to the responsibility of the Defendant, and the Defendant’s age, family relationship, economic situation, background and motive leading to the instant crime, and all matters on the sentencing expressed in the records and changes theory.