beta
Text
Defendants are not guilty.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A entered into a contract with the victim G to jointly manage the I identification point in the name of the wife F around July 18, 201, and, from August 22, 2011, Defendant B registered the business in the name of Defendant B and operated the said identification point jointly with the victim. Defendant B is a person who was registered as an optician with the above identification point from August 2, 201 to August 201, and was employed by the above identification point.
On December 31, 2013, the Defendants conspired to replace the entrance and security card and the fund management passbook at the above boundaries to prevent the victim from participating in the operation of the above boundaries while the dispute arose between the defendant A and the victim due to the settlement of business profits, etc. after the contract period of the above boundaries expires, and to interfere with the victim's affairs such as the operation of the above boundaries by replacing the entrance and security card and the fund management passbook at the above boundaries. On February 28, 2014, the Defendants returned the defendant B to the above boundary point and made it difficult for the victim to enter the above boundary point by replacing the entrance and security card at the above inside boundary point on the same day after he returned the defendant B to the above boundary point. On the same day, the victims continued to open the new bank in the name of the defendant B in the name of the defendant B in order to manage the funds at the above boundary. After opening the new bank in the name of the defendant B and opened the above three passbook to the above bank in the name of the above bank, and let the victim do no more interfere with the above operation of the passbook.
2. Determination
A. According to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the following facts are acknowledged.
① On July 18, 201, the victim G, the representative director of K, which runs the franchising franchising, shall be as follows: (a) the Defendant’s wife, and the Defendant’s wife, shall be as follows: (b) the Defendant’s wife, and (c) the Defendant