logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.02.09 2017고단3934
공무집행방해
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 23:30, 2017, at the Defendant’s residence located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (a) confirmed the scene of the police station affiliated with the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Police Station that was called out after receiving a report from 112 that the Defendant was entering into a marital fighting; (b) confirmed the site; and (c) went according to D; and (d) “I do not have any circumstances to do so.”

In the course of booming off a patrol lane after being arrested as a current offender of the offense of insult, it was assaulted twice by having D’s right-hand click with a hand hand by cutting off D’s mouth by a scam, etc.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting management duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. A fine of 1.5 million won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (the first and the second offense, the crime committed under the influence of alcohol is minor due to any contingent crime, and the degree of violence is minor due to any reporting of domestic violence, and as a result, the police officer sent the Defendant to the Defendant’s bet the police officer, and thereby, arrested him as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult, there are circumstances to consider the motive and circumstance as to the crime in this case. The fact that the victimized police officer wanted to leave the Defendant, the Defendant’s age, environment, etc. in relation to the insult that became the foundation of the case

arrow