A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Punishment of the crime

Victim D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "victim D") is a corporation whose head office and factory are located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu and whose main purpose is transportation, loading, unloading machinery, manufacturing and selling business, etc.

F is a person who, on January 26, 1996, became an employee of the victim D's management division and was promoted to the Deputy Management Director through his agency and division, from January 1, 2010 to the Deputy Management Director, and has overall control over the above company's accounting, general affairs, receipts and disbursements of funds, issuance and discount of bills, etc., and the defendant is a person who, on March 3, 198, became an employee of the above victim D's production division and became an employee of the above victim D's production division and was in charge of the business management in the domestic business division from March 3, 198, and was on December 31, 1997 after the head of division was retired from Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

F as a person in charge of financial management of the victim D, F is prohibited from bearing an obligation for a promissory note under the name of the victim D with any transaction relationship or no quid pro quo with the victim D, and even in the case of endorsement on a promissory note issued by another person under the name of the victim D, the issuer has a duty of care not to make an endorsement on a promissory note issued by an issuer which has no capacity to pay for the payment on the date of the payment of the promissory note, after

The Defendant, around February 2008, when the financial standing of the said D Seoul Agency, which was aggravated by the Defendant’s operation, was unable to get discounted in its name by two copies of the Promissory Notes (the total face value of KRW 244,80,00) issued under the name of the customer H Construction, which was paid as the payment for the work. The Defendant’s final endorsement to F in the name of the victim D and asked for the discount from D’s bank. The Defendant agreed to the payment of the discounted amount to the Defendant by means of the final endorsement from D’s bank in the name of the victim D, but the Promissory Notes issued under the said Section 2 was sent to the Defendant. However, there was a promissory note for the issuance of the SP advertising plan.