1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Facts of recognition

On March 8, 2011, A applied for provisional attachment against the debtor and the defendant under Seoul Central District Court 201Kadan36425, with respect to the claims such as salary, bonus, other allowances, retirement allowances, etc. to be paid by A, and the original copy of the provisional attachment order was served on the defendant on March 9, 2011.

A non-party company filed a lawsuit claiming loans with the Seoul Central District Court 201Gadan58358 due to the principal lawsuit of the above provisional seizure and received a favorable judgment on June 27, 2011, and the above judgment was finalized on July 20, 2011.

On September 26, 2011, the non-party company filed an order of seizure and collection with the Seoul Central District Court 201TTTTT 201TT 36829 with the debtor as the title of execution of the above final judgment and filed an order of seizure and collection with the Seoul Central District Court 201TTT 201Kadan36425, which was recorded in the separate sheet (the amount of salaries and allowances received each month by the debtor from the third party debtor) between the creditor and the debtor, and one half of the balance obtained by subtracting the tax and public charges from the final allowances (the principal salaries and allowances) received by the debtor in June and December of each year, and one half of the above claims, which was received in June and December of each year) and the provisional seizure of KRW 22,257,960 shall be transferred to the original seizure, and the remainder of 6,563,963 won shall be seized.

“A decision was made to the effect that it was

(hereinafter “instant seizure and collection order”). The original copy of the instant seizure and collection order was served on September 29, 201 on the Defendant.

On August 28, 2012, Nonparty Company transferred claims based on the above final judgment to the Plaintiff, and on February 12, 2013, the Plaintiff notified Nonparty A of the transfer of claims.

On March 18, 2013, the Plaintiff was granted the succeeding execution clause with respect to the said final judgment, which is an executive title, and a certified copy of the succeeding execution clause was served on A on March 18, 2013.

The defendant's deposit and A.