logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.08.18 2016노375
전자금융거래법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (the imprisonment of six months, the suspension of execution of two years, the observation of protection, and the community service order of 80 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that there is no record of criminal punishment in addition to punishment for a crime of this case, which is less than KRW 80,000,000, the defendant's profits acquired by the crime of this case are relatively less than KRW 800,000, and the defendant recognizes the crime and repents wrong facts.

However, even though the Defendant knew that the instant access medium was used in operating an illegal gambling site, he transferred it to an illegal gambling site operator. The instant access medium was used in operating the actual illegal gambling site, and the community service order issued by the lower court does not seem to have been a long time to the extent that the Defendant could not perform his duties, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and theories of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, and circumstances leading to the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow