A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete 80 hours of the sexual assault treatment lecture.

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 893"

1. On June 19, 2019, the Defendant, at around 14:30 on June 19, 2019, committed an indecent act by force against the victim C (a person, leisure, and age 46) who was investigating farmland, asked the victim C (a person, age 46) who was investigating farmland to “whether he/she is a place of solar capital,” and sexual intercourse with the victim, “I would like to live together,” “I would like to live together, I would like to do so,” and by the victim’s own hand, led the victim to the Defendant’s dead arms, and the victim committed an indecent act by force by force, such as: (a) he/she spreads his/her arms, prevents the escape of the victim; and (b) tried to catch the victim’s arms.

2. Indecent act by compulsion or injury on July 2, 2019;

A. On July 2, 2019, around 08:49, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim E (one’s name, two’s age, and forty-one’s age), following the victim E (one’s age), who was aboard his/her child in the school bus for childcare centers, on July 2, 2019.

B. The Defendant above A.

At the same time, at the same time and place as the above victim E, and at the victim's face by the tighter and hand, the victim suffered injury such as the dump of the shoulder, the 4 balance of the left side, etc. in need of treatment for about seven days.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Fknife car.

On June 29, 2019, around 17:15, the Defendant operated the roads in front of H funeral homes G in the direction of the I market from the direction of the Central Sports Park.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, in such a case, the driver engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to live well before and after the accident, prevent the accident from smoke, and drive the accident.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and entered the intersection in violation of the red signal, thereby leading up to the normal signal from the right side to the left side of the defendant's running direction.