1. The Defendant’s KRW 56,476,163 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from February 12, 2017 to September 14, 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties and the Defendant are also the main text of electric electronic dial dial dives, whereas the Plaintiff and the Defendant are precise dives that injects melting melt metals into the compulsory gold type that has been accurately processed in a way consistent with the main text form necessary to obtain the same main text as gold.

(A) Lastling is a company specializing in Lastling parts, and is a company that produces Mor Beling Hing, hereinafter referred to as “Morling”) among the parts of washing machines manufactured in the factory in Gwangju.

B. The Defendant’s patent registration number D EF G on the patent registration date of the patent application number of the Defendant’s patent registration patent application number, and the Defendant registered the patent (the details of the patent are as shown in Appendix 1; hereinafter “instant patent”) with respect to C used in the process of manufacturing laundter case, as described in the following table:

C. On September 24, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a petition for a trial on invalidation of registration against the Defendant on preservative measures, a principal case lawsuit, and a patent litigation. On September 26, 2015, the Intellectual Property Tribunal rendered a decision to dismiss the Plaintiff’s claim on May 26, 2015 (hereinafter “instant trial decision”).

B) Meanwhile, on September 29, 2014, the Defendant used the Plaintiff as the Intellectual Property Tribunal No. 2014Da2418 against the Plaintiff in the process of manufacturing the Modern case (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s product”), and the equipment photographs and technical composition are as shown in attached Table 2.

(2) On May 26, 2015, the Korean Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board claimed that the patent falls under the scope of the patent right of this case and claimed a trial to confirm the scope of the patent right, and the Korean Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board rendered a trial decision accepting the Defendant’s claim. (2) On August 19, 2014, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff’s product infringed the patent of this case as the Gwangju District Court 2014Kahap50138, and used the Plaintiff’s product.