Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On March 25, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face at one time on the ground that the Defendant, an employee, who was aware of the Defendant’s dispute with the owner of the singinginging practice place in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel underground, was unable to enter the singing practice place, on the ground that the Defendant was an employee who was aware of the Defendant’s singinginging practice place (29 tax).
2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on the ground that the police officer F of the Suwon Police Station E (a police box) who was dispatched after receiving 112 reports at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (1), demanded the Defendant to identify the Defendant.
Sheedi,
We have expressed my desire to see “Woo”, and carried a drinking, and the police officer G, who was next to the police box, engaged in flabing the Defendant, flabing the fat of the above G, and the flabing of the flab.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reports.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. Statement of the police statement related to G;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;
1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order is that the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, has obstructed the police officers from performing their duties in return for a report.
Defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime several times.
However, there was no significant result of the defendant's criminal trial, and it is against the defendant.
In addition, punishment shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of the sentencing factors shown in the trial process of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, on condition of community service.