logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.29 2018나81440
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Cases of indemnity between the insurers of vehicles involved in a traffic accident;

A. On September 6, 2018, at the time of Cheongju-si, the insured vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) Defendant Insured vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”)’s insurance relation, such as the background of the accident, where the accident occurred, the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the process of the instant accident in the apartment parking lot passage in the petitioner-gu, Cheongju-si (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) was proceeding along the parking lot. However, the Defendant vehicle on which the parking was parked was moving back between the parked vehicle and the vehicle left behind to the left to the left to the left to the left part.

Details of the payment of insurance money of KRW 3,200,000 (Deduction of Self-Damage Charges) for the Plaintiff

B. The instant accident, which was judged as negligence, was caused by the negligence of the driver of the Defendant vehicle, who did not properly examine the rear while driving the instant accident at the parking lot.

In light of the circumstances, such as the shock of the vehicle and the fact that the Plaintiff’s vehicle was rapidly faced to the direction to avoid a collision, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff’s driver was negligent.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1 through 5, Eul 1 through 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

C. Defendant’s duty of reimbursement of KRW 3,200,000

2. The decision of the court of first instance at the same time is justified, and the defendant's appeal is without merit.

arrow