logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.06.12 2014고정181
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 26, 2012, at around 02:05, the Defendant, C, and C, and D conspired with the Defendant, C, and C, and D, a single accident that the Defendant left the road while carrying D and driving the Epir vehicle, and the said vehicle was unable to carry out insurance management because it was not covered by self-insurance, the Defendant and C, and C, and C, and C were to receive the insurance insurance as if the said Opir vehicle was partially driven by the Defendant’s driving of FST7 car and completed the said car with the victim Samsung FM fire.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 3,376,880 won from the victim under the pretext of hospital treatment expenses, agreed money, etc., and acquired it by fraud.

2. At around 04:00 on July 19, 2012, the Defendant, G, and H conspired with the Defendant, G, and H’s joint criminal conduct, and at the long distance of the Kumpo-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, G stopped before driving the Impoma car while driving the Impo. The Defendant, while driving the Kmpo-gu car with the J on board, received the insurance as if the said vehicle was an accident caused by the victim Samsung Fire.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 13,741,840 from the victim for the purpose of hospital treatment expenses, vehicle repair expenses, etc., and acquired them by deceit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written confirmation of repayment;

1. Article 347(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow