1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On May 12, 2004, the plaintiff asserts that the defendant is obligated to pay the above money to the plaintiff, since he lent 40 million won to the defendant on May 12, 2004.

According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments by Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, although it is recognized that the plaintiff had a certificate of the personal seal impression issued on May 12, 2004 by Seoul, the issuer, and the defendant, as stated in Seoul, and the defendant's certificate of the personal seal impression issued on May 12, 2004, it is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff lent KRW 40 million to the defendant on May 12, 2004, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

(Y) The plaintiff lent KRW 40 million to the defendant on May 12, 2004, however, the loan claim of this case 10 years after the expiration of the statute of limitations). 2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed on the grounds that it is not reasonable.