logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.04.28 2015고정477
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 9, 2014, the Defendant, at the E main point in Pyeongtaek-si D, committed a conflict with the victim F (51 years of age) as a matter of this alcohol value, and brought an assault to the victim's face at the victim's face in drinking, etc., and the facts charged were caused by the assault, such as "when the victim's face is taken," and the injury was caused by the bad influence of the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement made by the witness G in the fourth public trial protocol;

1. CCTV images;

1. Even if it is not clear whether the defendant's drinking act was the direct cause of the victim's injury, as a result of the determination of evidence related to the relevant person's photographs and diagnosis papers, it is obvious whether the defendant's drinking act was the direct cause of the victim's injury. However, according to the evidence above, the defendant may sufficiently recognize the fact of the victim's injury by committing a series of violence against the victim, such as drinking the victim's face.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. On November 6, 2014, the injured party C was injured by the Defendant during a dispute with the Defendant on the ground that he/she had his/her sentence on the third floor corridor of the I building in Pyeongtaek-si, which was in the third floor of Pyeongtaek-si, and the Defendant was faced with her flab, but he/she was flabing the Defendant’s flab, and was flabing twice the Defendant’s flab on the flab face.

The Defendant, at the same time and place as above, brought about a dispute with the victim C for the said reasons, and flabed the victim’s flab, and flabed the flab, and flabed the victim’s flab, and flabed the 4th hand hand, which requires treatment for about 5 weeks by taking the flab, etc.

2. A witness G who is a witness of the judgment was not deemed to have shown C in the court, and witness G only when he/she enters the corridor that prevents him/her from escape.

statement, C.

arrow