logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.02.17 2014고단1599
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant shall pay 15 million won to the applicant for compensation.

3.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would have to pay the victim with the money that he/she has to pay, and he/she would have to pay, the money that he/she has to pay, once he/she lends 15 million won to the victim,” at a leap establishment of the victim E (Nam, South and 41 years of age) located in Jeonsan-gu, Jeonju-si.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any special property, and was liable to pay 30 million won or more, and even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim due to the chronic renal failure, the financial condition of which requires a large amount of money due to the expenses for children who are college students, etc., the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay it after one week.

Nevertheless, on July 20, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement as above, and received KRW 15 million from the victim to the post office account under the name of the Defendant.

2. A person who intends to conduct domestic fee-charging job placement services in violation of the Employment Security Act shall register with the Governor of a Special Self-Governing Province or the head of a Si/Gun

The Defendant, around 16:00 on July 10, 2012, introduced three women, such as f, at a leap establishment operated by the above E, located in Jeonsan-gu, Jeonju-si, to work at the above leap establishment. In return, the Defendant received KRW 12 million per capita in total from E.

Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in fee-charging job placement services without being registered with the female Mayor having jurisdiction over the location of the principal place of business.

Summary of Evidence

The defendant's legal statement, each prosecutor's protocol on G/H, each police's protocol of statement on E/F, and the application of statutes on financial transaction details.

1. Relevant Article of the Employment Security Act concerning facts constituting an offense: Each fraud by which imprisonment is selected: Violation of Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act: Article 47 (1) 1 and Article 19 (1) of the Employment Security Act;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Article 31(1) and (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Compensation Orders and Provisional Execution Sentences.

arrow