logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.07.09 2014나52711
공항시설사용료등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Grounds for the judgment which cited the judgment of the court of first instance for this case, and the dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance for this case

2.(b)

The following facts in the 4th line “ as well as A,” and the 5th line “as described in the first sentence,” and the 5th line “as described in the 5th line of the certification of customer information subject to the claim for user fees of the Incheon International Airport Facility Facility Use Fees,” the term “Uirline Co. Ltd. Ltd,” and the term “the fact that the name of the representative” is indicated in the 5th line of the name of the representative.

3.2

In the first part of the first part of the port, “the Defendant is a mother nationality of all passengers using the U.S. aircraft, and both air tickets have been collected directly by U.S. S. agent in the Thailand. In light of the fact that the Defendant asserts that there is no collection of airport usage fees, etc. issued in the airline tickets, etc., which are included in the airline tickets, the Defendant is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

(2) The court below held that the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just because the plaintiff's appeal is just in conclusion, and it is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow