logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.06.21 2019고정662
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 18:30 on the street in front of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on December 13, 2018, on the premise that the victim C (the age of 42) is leading to the operation of the otobane, obstructed the front of the victim; (b) obstructed the victim’s front; and (c) interfered with the victim’s “after the flabing of the obb, if the flab is passed by the flab,” and flabed off the victim’s flab, and d

Accordingly, the defendant committed assault against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The date and time indicated in the judgment of the defendant among the police interrogation protocol against the defendant, and the statement to the effect that the victim was breath;

1. The police interrogation protocol against C (the defendant asserts to the effect that C as the victim is the actual perpetrator and that C should not escape until the police reaches the police. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, the defendant's oral statement as stated in the victim's statement, that is, it is difficult to see that the police attempted to flee before a clerical error, and that it is difficult to see that the victim was a victim since it was not the defendant, and that it is difficult to see that the police attempted to flee before a clerical error, taking into account the specific statement about the victim's damage situation, the fact of assaulting the victim can be acknowledged as stated in the judgment of the defendant. Accordingly, the defendant's assertion is without merit).

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. All the arguments and records of the instant case, including the background leading up to disputes between the Defendant and the victim in sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the contents and degree of the Defendant’s assault, the attitude toward the Defendant’s court and investigation agency, and the record of criminal punishment.

arrow