The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

The purport and purport of the appeal

1. The purport of the claim;

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who worked as a security guard until October 27, 2018 in Busan metropolitan Daegu apartment, and the Defendant is a resident of the said apartment.

B. The Defendant: (a) entered the above apartment guard room on July 6, 2018; and (b) demanded the Plaintiff to keep the cell phone in the taxi and check CCTV in the taxi at home; (c) however, while the Plaintiff was in the guard room without being confirmed at the guard room, it threatens the Plaintiff to be in the management room, as if the Defendant would have been at the time when he was in the management room; (d) the Plaintiff was able to take the Plaintiff’s bath to the Plaintiff; and (e) the Plaintiff got the Plaintiff out of the floor by pushing the Plaintiff’s bath with his knife and pushing the Plaintiff over the floor, thereby hindering the Plaintiff with no force of security business, such as taking a large sound keling care at the same time and at the same place; (e) on the ground that the Plaintiff was charged with the injury of the Plaintiff and having received a summary order of KRW 100,000,000 for a fine for negligence due to obstruction of business (Seoul District Court Decision 2016Da564065, May 4, 665).

The Defendant, on the ground that there was no proof of a crime, found the Defendant guilty of the crime of interference with the above business, and the first instance court ( Busan District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Decision 2019, 133) found the Defendant guilty of the crime of interference with the above business, but the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,000 due to interference with the business, on the ground that the Defendant’s injury of assault, which stated that “the Defendant would have threatened the Plaintiff as if he was her at the time of provoking while taking a bath view, and caused the Plaintiff to go beyond the floor by pushing the Plaintiff’s her khumb and pushing the Plaintiff’s knick, thereby

Since then, the appeal court of Busan District Court 2019No. 2842) dismissed the prosecutor's appeal and the above judgment of the first instance became final and conclusive as it is.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 3, 4, and 5, and arguments.