logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2014.04.25 2013고단612
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving of the Cras.

At around 05:50 on September 8, 2013, the Defendant driven the above van, which led to the intersection of the shooting distance in front of the Jinwon-gun, Jinwon-gun, Jinwon-gun, Jinwon-gun, at a speed of 30km from the breadth to the breadth from the breadth of the facility, at the speed of 30km.

Since the place is an intersection, the driver has a duty of care to reduce the speed to the person engaged in driving service and to enter the intersection from the left side of the moving direction or the right side of the vehicle, and to prevent the accident with other vehicles from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and entered the intersection without properly examining the right and the right and the right and the part of the front part of the D(the age of 51) drive 4.5 tons and the front part of the D(the age of 51) trucked from the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the D(the age of 51) trucked

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim F (V, 66 years old) who was on the same line of duty as above due to the negligence in the course of business as above, about 14 weeks in need of treatment for about 10 weeks, and the injury of the victim G (V, 71 years old) in the 3, 4, and 9, such as a chest scarlet, which require treatment for about 14 weeks.

2. Despite the fact that an automobile for private use in violation of the Passenger Transport Service Act is not offered or leased for transport at a cost, the Defendant provided a private automobile for commercial transport by means of a car for private use, from August 7, 2013 to September 8, 2013, using a car for private use owned by the Defendant, from the Plaintiff, to the Defendant, for a car for private use, from the 18th class members, of the car for a car for the use of the car for the use of the car for the use of the car for private use, to the workplace for the use of the car for the use of the car for the use of the car for the use of the car for private use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of F, G, and D;

1.Each.

arrow