The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the Defendant’s recognition of all each of the instant crimes at the latest, and reflects the fact that the amount of each of the instant crimes was not so significant, and that some victims are not punished against the Defendant, or that they are in advance.

However, each of the crimes of this case is an unfavorable circumstance, where the defendant received alcohol, speech, etc. from the victims on six occasions without the intent or ability to pay the price, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits equivalent to the drinking value, etc., and interfered with the victims' work on four occasions. In light of the frequency, contents, etc. of the crime, it is not good that the crime was committed; the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case when he was punished several times, including imprisonment for the same kind of crime, even though he had the record of punishment several times, and the criminal records, etc. of the defendant appears to have been repeatedly prevented the same crime without any awareness or reflect.

Considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, and various conditions of sentencing indicated in the instant records and pleadings, including the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s judgment cannot be deemed unreasonable to have exceeded, or maintain, the reasonable bounds of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.